jottings from tertius
views of the world from my worldview window
"If there was no God, there would be no atheists." G.K. Chesterton
SITES OF NOTE
Tektonics Apologetics Ministry
The Adarwinist reader
Bede's Library: the Alliance of Faith and Reason
A Christian Thinktank
Doxa:Christian theology and apologetics
Mike Gene Teleologic
Errant Skeptics Research Institute
Stephen Jones' CreationEvolutionDesign
Touchstone: a journal of mere Christianity: mere comments
The Secularist Critique: Deconstructing secularism
Ex-atheist.com: I Wasn't Born Again Yesterday
imago veritatis by Alan Myatt
Solid Rock Ministries
The Internet Monk: a webjournal by Michael Spencer
The Sydney Line: the website of Keith Windschuttle
Miranda Devine's writings in the Sydney Morning Herald
David Horowitz frontpage magazine
Thoughts of a 21st century Christian Philosopher
Steven Lovell's philosophical themes from C.S.Lewis
Peter S. Williams Christian philosophy and apologetics
Shandon L. Guthrie
Clayton Cramer's Blog
Andrew Bolt columns
Ann Coulter columns
"These are the days when the Christian is expected to praise every creed except his own." G.K.Chesterton
"You cannot grow a beard in a moment of passion." G.K.Chesterton
"As you perhaps know, I haven't always been a Christian. I didn't go to religion to make me happy. I always knew a bottle of Port would do that."C. S. Lewis
"I blog, therefore I am." Anon
Friday, October 01, 2004
Two naugthy boys let the cat out of the bag and get sent to bed without any dinner for being so very, very wicked
Despite presenting a thesis that has all the force of simple logic, politically incorrect scientists commit hari-kari...
A Natural History of Rape: The Biological Basis of Sexual Coercion sets out a strictly Darwinian view... The authors, biologist Randy Thornhill and anthropologist Craig Palmer, state their position bluntly: "We fervently believe that, just as the leopard's spots and the giraffe's elongated neck are the results of aeons of past Darwinian selection, so is rape." Elsewhere they proclaim: "There is no doubt that rape has evolutionary - and hence genetic - origins."
Margaret Wertheim is only one of the many science writers who thinks that, what she terms the Z-grade analysis [sic] that reigns in A Natural History of Rape gives [shock, horror] evolution a bad name.
Now, why would that be? Especially as she acknowledges it is a strictly Darwinian view. In response to critics Thornhill insisted with exasperation that since evolution is true, it must also be true that "Every feature of every living thing, including human beings, has an underlying evolutionary background. That's not a debatable matter." Surely Richard Dawkins would approve... After all if one accepts the neo-Darwinian view such reasoning is axiomatic.
Question: Is the Z grade analysis only in the writing of the book, or is it inherent in the Darwinian theory?